SCOTT:SCOTT-NO November 2017

= Participants =
 * Note that the Google forms take some time (many minutes and refreshes) before you can see your name listed.

=Logistics= Meeting takes place at Smart Innovation Norway in Halden, Remmen Kunnskapspart =Agenda=
 * 10:00 Welcome - table round
 * 10:15 Entry:
 * SCOTT-NO contract,
 * Vision of project (your comments, see presentation "SCOTT main message" presented in Porto 18Oct2017)
 * The high-level: Security functionality, security classes, metrics - and privacy labeling
 * 10:35 Heidi (NCE Smart)
 * The ongoing research activities of SIN (how we can exploit those in SCOTT)
 * Initial plans for the joint workshop for 2018 with SCOTT WP7 air quality,
 * Private funded smart building project Smarte Remmen and IoTSec project.
 * 12:00 lunsj
 * 12:45 Showcase Norway
 * Short update of all WP responsible, see SCOTT:Responsibilities
 * Status of WP (highlights), specification of WPs

including:
 * Lars Thomas - Tellu contributions with diabetes monitoring in WP21
 * Maghsoud Morshedi - Framework for WP8
 * Toktam Ramezani - The project status, BB Measurement
 * Hamed Arshad - SABAC


 * Contributions from Partners
 * 14:10 Planning Tromsø meeting
 * 14:30 AOB, Action Items, next meetings
 * 15:00 End of Meeting


 * see SCOTT:Responsibilities and SCOTT:Partner_contribution

= From Use Cases to Show Cases =
 * Starting point: use case scenario(s)
 * from use cases
 * to development
 * to implementation
 * to demonstration
 * to showcases

Each use case should have three categories for BuildingBlocks (BB)
 * 1) Need to have (for the functioning of the use case)
 * 2) Nice to have (could contribute to the use case, depends on developments and API)
 * 3) Future "enhancing the story"

Example:
 * need to be established

https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2017/01/05/iot-trust-framework/ 37 principles for IoT trust framework

Challenges
Reviewer(s) and Forms:
 * Why do we need "harmonised deliverables"?
 * Focus on impact of use case

Real-world relevance
 * from use cases to development to implementation to demonstration to showcases

Administrative overhead
 * ''bin-counting dominated: deliverables, excel, phone conferenes, coordination
 * too little focus on technical work

Impact on National and European Scale
 * Driving forces are often the BuildingBlocks, not the use cases
 * missing focus on showcases for SCOTT
 * impact analysis for Europe:
 * Leadership (ECSEL)
 * Jobb creation

WP showcases and updates
WP6 - coordinating

WP7 - Air Quality -
 * showcase: Smart Remmen and VTT
 * extended by management
 * Workshop as main showcase

WP8 - Managed Wireless
 * 25 installations Smart Home
 * Showcase: wireless services
 * Future Showcase: 5G Network slicing for Free Access to Health, Education and Governmental Information

WP9
 * 20 scenarios, define "new scenario" using 3 building blocks: ABAC, ...
 * showcase: facility management in Gdansk (replay from DEWI)

WP13 - Trustable Wireless vehicle communication network
 * 4 PM EyeNetworks - smart sensors
 * 2 PM moved to WP26, due to required manpwoer for meas. sec development

WP14
 * 1 PM move to WP26

WP15 - Vehicle as sensor (related to WP9)
 * UiO 3 PM - 1 PM used, 1 PM used
 * SmartIO 3 PM -> moved to WP8
 * Telenor, Wolffia, HiOA

WP21 - Assisted living and community care
 * showcase: fall sensor
 * showcase: diabetes monitoring
 * future showcase: 4.75G Network Slicing (interoperability: health care and alarm services co-ordinating)

Building Blocks Manpower
Moving PM from BB
 * if PM is moved within a WP, information to WP leader is sufficient (no Amendment)
 * if PM is moved from e.g. WP24 to WP26, then we need an amendment

Toktam and Maghsoud to clarify on PM move in BB

Buz opportunities
BUZ cooperation
 * F-Sense as SDK to eSmart, EyeNetworks, TellU and Telenor

Future: Assessment of Technology
SP1 suggestion: assessment of each requirement
 * assessment of implementation of requirements
 * based on state of implementation
 * Draft proposal D1.1.
 * Proposal: Adding more granularity
 * "readiness level"

Suggestion: High-level view
 * focus on building blocks
 * SP1: Requirements (driving the project?)
 * SP2: The story of future services and their requirements (use cases)
 * SP3: Technology development


 * Including the new participants and students
 * Reviewers and the review forms
 * In addition to lead UC and weak UC, future applications could be considered as well
 * Administrative overhead
 * Demonstration: Platform in WP8, Connectivity in NCE Smart
 * Planning workshop for 2018 with SCOTT WP7 air quality and WP8